Does the VC landscape need another Studio?

If you’re building a SaaS company in Belgium right now, you don’t need me to tell you that the mood has changed. Capital is still there, but it’s slower, more selective, and far less forgiving of vague stories. Over the past year we’ve all seen the same pattern: fewer “spray and pray” seed rounds, more pressure on early revenue, and investors asking uncomfortable questions much earlier than they used to.

As a founder, that shift is not a problem in itself. The real risk is navigating it alone.

What I’ve learned—sometimes the hard way—is that the first real bottleneck in a SaaS journey is not product. It’s execution: turning a promising MVP into something customers actually buy, renew, and expand. That gap is exactly where many Belgian SaaS teams stall today, especially when they start talking to enterprise buyers or preparing for a first institutional round.

This is why I’d strongly recommend at least having a conversation with Anament.io.

Not because they promise shortcuts or magic funding. Quite the opposite. They operate in the reality we’re all dealing with now: longer sales cycles, higher bars for governance, and investors who expect founders to understand their numbers, their pipeline, and their go-to-market far earlier than before. What makes the difference is that they’ve been on both sides of the table—building, selling, scaling, and financing software businesses over decades, including in Belgium.

In today’s climate, advice alone isn’t enough. You need people who are willing to roll up their sleeves, challenge your assumptions, and help you de-risk the hard parts before they become expensive mistakes. That’s what a good venture studio should do.

If you’re a Belgian SaaS founder with traction—or close to it—talking to Anament.io won’t cost you much time. Not talking to them might cost you a year.

‍